"blag-it" Forum

History related topics => Ancient history before 3000 BC => Topic started by: MsLeon on 07 January, 2020, 12:19:43 PM

Title: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: MsLeon on 07 January, 2020, 12:19:43 PM
Nope I haven't lost it. ;)  I was looking-up all sorts last night and by chance found some SE results saying that there wasn't a moon a long time ago.  Some strange place somewhere in Bolivia apparently built about 11000 years ago was inhabited by people that never made references of the moon.  Crazy, right?
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: McGaskil on 07 January, 2020, 09:35:39 PM
Never heard of this, certainly sounds far out! :P  What is this place in Bolivia called then?
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: A.Jenery on 09 January, 2020, 09:52:30 AM
Well this certainly got my attention it sounded so incredible, so did some SE'ing and found this site (https://www.historydisclosure.com/there-was-a-time-when-the-moon-did-not-exist/) which mentions somewhere called Kalasasaya in Bolivia built about 13000 yrs ago. :o   Scroll down to third paragraph in the article.
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: MsLeon on 09 January, 2020, 11:32:50 AM
Well this certainly got my attention it sounded so incredible, so did some SE'ing and found this site (https://www.historydisclosure.com/there-was-a-time-when-the-moon-did-not-exist/) which mentions somewhere called Kalasasaya in Bolivia built about 13000 yrs ago. :o  Scroll down to third paragraph in the article.
Same site I found! :-*   Sorry, should have said to begin with.  But what does this mean??  That 8000 years before much was recorded in biblical areas there was this Kalasasaya place that made no record of the moon?  Don't get it! :-\
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: blag-it Admin on 09 January, 2020, 01:24:53 PM
I can see why this is surprising.  Wasn't it Henry Ford that said history is bunk?  Or something like that.  How were they able to translate any writings or symbols that they found in this 13,000 year old city to know if the moon is mentioned or not?  Thought provoking find though. ;)


Admin
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: MsLeon on 10 January, 2020, 04:55:58 AM
I can see why this is surprising.  Wasn't it Henry Ford that said history is bunk?  Or something like that.  How were they able to translate any writings or symbols that they found in this 13,000 year old city to know if the moon is mentioned or not?  Thought provoking find though. ;)


Admin
Get that, for writing's anyway.  Must be some truth though to what's said on this site, right?  What about any symbols?  They're visual, don't need to translate them...  :-\
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: ATH019 on 10 January, 2020, 08:36:19 PM
Many cave paintings depict stick-figures hunting animals about thirty times their size, but you don't take them literally. ;)   So I guess even symbols have to be translated in a sense.


Global Moderator
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: cybernut on 12 January, 2020, 02:43:03 PM
Just googled 'Kalasasaya no moon' and right at the top of the list it suggests 'Kalasasaya' was a temple.  The site says that the 'place' was somewhere called Tiwanaku. ???
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: blag-it Admin on 13 January, 2020, 07:07:50 AM
Just googled 'Kalasasaya no moon' and right at the top of the list it suggests 'Kalasasaya' was a temple.  The site says that the 'place' was somewhere called Tiwanaku. ???
Yes, seems you're right!  Well spotted! Some of us got our wires crossed, including me. :P  Had another good look at that site and it actually says Tiwanaku was built 13000 yrs ago, not Kalasasaya which was a temple in it!


Admin
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: McGaskil on 13 January, 2020, 09:17:46 PM
Just googled 'Kalasasaya no moon' and right at the top of the list it suggests 'Kalasasaya' was a temple.  The site says that the 'place' was somewhere called Tiwanaku. ???
Yes, seems you're right!  Well spotted! Some of us got our wires crossed, including me. :P  Had another good look at that site and it actually says Tiwanaku was built 13000 yrs ago, not Kalasasaya which was a temple in it!


Admin
Clears things up a bit, but doubt there was ever a period when there was no moon and then 'suddenly there was one' after some cataclysm, great flood what have you.  Do ppl have any idea what it would take to cause this?
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: MsLeon on 14 January, 2020, 09:54:27 AM
Just googled 'Kalasasaya no moon' and right at the top of the list it suggests 'Kalasasaya' was a temple.  The site says that the 'place' was somewhere called Tiwanaku. ???
Yes, seems you're right!  Well spotted! Some of us got our wires crossed, including me. :P  Had another good look at that site and it actually says Tiwanaku was built 13000 yrs ago, not Kalasasaya which was a temple in it!


Admin
Clears things up a bit, but doubt there was ever a period when there was no moon and then 'suddenly there was one' after some cataclysm, great flood what have you.  Do ppl have any idea what it would take to cause this?
Really??  Why do these sites seem to show info to the contrary then?  That stuff found in this temple/site built 11000-13000 yrs ago doesn't reference a moon?? ???
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: blag-it Admin on 31 January, 2020, 10:45:28 AM
As all involved with this topic will realize, this was just moved to this newly created (at time of posting) forum.


Admin
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: MsLeon on 01 February, 2020, 09:21:16 AM
As all involved with this topic will realize, this was just moved to this newly created (at time of posting) forum.


Admin
Good idea adding this board. :-*  I only put it in the other one to begin with as that seemed the closest date wise.
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: ATH019 on 02 February, 2020, 09:36:42 AM
Yep!  This new sub-forum makes sense for this topic.  Good to have! 8)


Global Moderator
Title: Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago
Post by: McGaskil on 04 February, 2020, 09:50:42 AM
Just googled 'Kalasasaya no moon' and right at the top of the list it suggests 'Kalasasaya' was a temple.  The site says that the 'place' was somewhere called Tiwanaku. ???
Yes, seems you're right!  Well spotted! Some of us got our wires crossed, including me. :P  Had another good look at that site and it actually says Tiwanaku was built 13000 yrs ago, not Kalasasaya which was a temple in it!


Admin
Clears things up a bit, but doubt there was ever a period when there was no moon and then 'suddenly there was one' after some cataclysm, great flood what have you.  Do ppl have any idea what it would take to cause this?
Really??  Why do these sites seem to show info to the contrary then?  That stuff found in this temple/site built 11000-13000 yrs ago doesn't reference a moon?? ???

Don't know, but it would have taken a planet at least earth-sized to push the moon to a position where 'we could see it'.  I don't buy that for an instant!