0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: cybernut on 26 September, 2020, 09:39:31 AMThanks! I know it was certainly a silly mistake to make. Must be because both begin with an 'm' that made me think of moon not mars - and o.c the moon landing was in 1969 - and well that's my excuse... Everyone's entitled to an excuse. Anyway, so you still think it didn't happen? How could they have fabricated something on that scale involving numerous US gvmnt departments, research bodies and so on?
Thanks! I know it was certainly a silly mistake to make. Must be because both begin with an 'm' that made me think of moon not mars - and o.c the moon landing was in 1969 - and well that's my excuse...
But you don't know that!Admin
They may well have signed NDA's to stop scientific and technical stuff from being leaked, but this still doesn't mean the mission's were fabricated.Global Moderator
Quote from: ATH019 on 05 June, 2021, 07:10:45 AMThey may well have signed NDA's to stop scientific and technical stuff from being leaked, but this still doesn't mean the mission's were fabricated.Global ModeratorIt doesn't mean they weren't either and I just don't see how they had the capability to send two landers onto the surface of Mars just seven years after the manned moon mission. Both Viking 1 and Viking 2 landed in 1976 allegedly...